Professor Robert B. Nature's Wealth. Pieter J. Climate Engineering and the Law. Michael B. The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services. Steven E. Glenn Dr Goodrich. Environmental Law for Biologists.
Tristan Kimbrell. Richard L.
3 reasons why data is not the new oil - and why this matters to India
Carbon Play. Robert William Falls. Instream Flow Protection. David M. Reforming Federal Land Management. Allan K. Green vs. Ryan M. Free Market Environmentalism for the Next Generation. Natural Resources for the 21st Century. Dwight Hair.
China's Transformation, a Challenge for Political Economy
Private Property and the Endangered Species Act. Jason F. Richard Brewer. The Rising Tide. Lynne Edgerton. Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration. Mary Doyle. Species at Risk. Biodiversity and the Law. Leesteffy Jenkins. Saving a Place: Endangered Species in the 21st Century. John A. Understanding Environmental Administration and Law, 3rd Edition.
Susan J. Current Issues in Natural Resource Policy.
- The Magical Flying Bed;
- YSI: Economics of Innovation Projects;
- Stone Fox Reading Group Activity Guide?
- Policy Partnership on Women and the Economy;
Paul R. Water Policy in Texas. Ronald C. Water Policy in Minnesota. William Easter. Prospects for Alternative Energy Development in the U. Brent S. Natural Resource Administration. Donald W. Overtapped Oasis. Marc Reisner. Between Two Fires. Stephen J. The World's Water Peter H.
- Join Kobo & start eReading today!
- Renewal Journal 19: Church?
- Economics After Neoliberalism.
- Economics of Innovation!
- Bloomberg - Are you a robot?!
- Bloomberg - Are you a robot?;
- Love Boston Terriers - Stories and Photos of Boston Terriers by the Owners (Volume 1)!
Collaborative Planning for Wetlands and Wildlife. David Salvesen. No Place Distant. David Havlick. Asian Development Bank. The Environmental Case. Judith A. Rebuilding the Ark. Jonathan Adler. The Lukewarmer's Way. Thomas Fuller. Mazzucato argues that the rewards should be much more explicit.
What is Kobo Super Points?
If the public sector is crucial to major technological developments, then the public should get a larger share in the rewards. How could the government do this?
Staunch believers in free markets may argue that this indeed sounds suspiciously like socialism, since it could result in a host of companies partly in the hands of government ownership. Mazzucato believes asking the question about how the public will get a share of the rewards in taxpayer-funded investments, with no particular prescriptions for the answers, has to be part of the policymaking process. Mazzucato has fans in seemingly unexpected places. Tyler Cowen, an economics professor at George Mason University who co-runs a popular economics blog , is one.
In spite of his defense of corporate America, Cowen agrees with some of what Mazzucato has to say. She detailed how some of the greatest inventions of the past few decades have their foundations in public-sector funded programs, often via the military or academia. Take the iPhone. Mazzucato also notes that the iPhone benefitted indirectly from public investment in the growth of the US semiconductor industry and large-scale military procurement of microprocessors, which helped drive down costs and commercialize the technology.
More directly, academics at the University of Delaware, funded by a National Science Foundation and CIA fellowship program, developed multi-touch scrolling and gestures for screens; they created a company called FingerWorks that was bought by Apple in , two years before the iPhone was launched.
SRI International created a spin-off company, Siri, in that was bought by Apple a few years later. Five years later, she published The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy , which delves deeper into why the conventional wisdom is wrong. What has allowed this incorrect narrative to persist is a misunderstanding of value, she argues.
To be clear, this is value in the economic sense, not values in terms of ethics or morality.
The Technology of Property Rights (The Political Economy Forum)
Historically in economics, value was determined by the cost of production. Since production was mostly labor, this became a labor theory of value—anyone familiar with the work of Karl Marx or classical political economy will recognize this term. Normally this slopes downwards, which is known as the law of diminishing marginal utility.
Related The Technology of Property Rights (The Political Economy Forum)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved